For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Procurement & Construction

Variable Points

The Procurement & Construction aspect assesses whether the entity incorporates sustainability considerations into procurement and construction processes, including requirements for materials, equipment, and construction practices. Integrating sustainability at these stages helps reduce environmental impacts and supports more sustainable delivery of new developments.


1

PC0: Procurement & Construction Context

Maximum Points

Not Scored

Static

Validation

Evidence not required

Control dependent?

No

Is there context that an investor or similar stakeholder needs to understand the entity’s response to the Procurement & Construction indicators?

[SCORING KEY] A "scoring weight" is the fraction of the indicator's maximum score that a selection contributes (a multiplier, not a fixed point value). "[validated]" means the selection is subject to validation outputs. INPUT TYPES: groups are labelled (radio — select exactly one; options are mutually exclusive) or (checkbox — select all that apply); radio options are alternatives (not additive), checkbox options add together. CAPPING: total scoring is capped at the indicator's maximum (1/1); selecting options whose combined weight exceeds 1/1 does not award more than the maximum, and a group's contribution is capped at its own weight.

PC0 | Procurement & Construction Context — Not scored
Yes (provide a short, headline statement to inform interpretation of the Procurement & Construction indicators) / No.

Assessment Instructions

Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?

This indicator provides the entity with the opportunity to disclose additional context to support the interpretation of its responses to the Procurement & Construction indicators, helping stakeholders better understand the entity’s approach and circumstances.

Input: What is the purpose of this indicator?

Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If ‘Yes’, provide context to support the interpretation of the entity’s responses to this aspect’s indicators.

Open text box: The content of this open text box is not used for scoring, but will be included in the Reports. Participants should use this open text box to provide further details, context, or comments related to the subject.

Terminology

Construction Requirements

Formally defined criteria or standards that must be followed during construction activities.

Sustainable Procurement

Encourage, facilitate or require the reduction of consumption of goods within the building or premises and/or the sourcing of sustainable or ethical goods. Clauses can relate to reduction of paper consumption, supply of biodegradable materials, use of recycled paper, building materials, etc.

Validation: What evidence is required?

No evidence required.

Scoring

This indicator is not scored.


2

PC1: Equipment Specifications

Validation

Evidence not required

Control dependent?

No

Does the entity have specified requirements for the sustainability attributes of equipment installed during development?

[SCORING KEY] A "scoring weight" is the fraction of the indicator's maximum score that a selection contributes (a multiplier, not a fixed point value). "[validated]" means the selection is subject to validation outputs. INPUT TYPES: groups are labelled (radio — select exactly one; options are mutually exclusive) or (checkbox — select all that apply); radio options are alternatives (not additive), checkbox options add together. CAPPING: total scoring is capped at the indicator's maximum (1/1); selecting options whose combined weight exceeds 1/1 does not award more than the maximum, and a group's contribution is capped at its own weight.

PC1 | Equipment Specifications — Not scored
Yes (sustainability specifications have been established for: Mechanical equipment (HVAC); Electrical equipment; Servers and computing hardware; Networking and connectivity; Other; describe how requirements are set and exceed code/regulatory requirements) / No.

Assessment Instructions

Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?

This indicator assesses whether the entity has established sustainability requirements for equipment used in development projects, including how these requirements are defined and applied. Setting clear specifications can help reduce environmental impacts and improve the overall sustainability performance of installed equipment.

Input: How do I complete this indicator?

Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.

  • The sustainability requirements need to exceed code or regulatory requirements.

  • Other: State the other sustainability specification that the entity has established. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of the selected option above.

Open text box: The content of this open text box is not used for scoring, but will be included in the Insights and Benchmark Reports. Participants should use this open text box to provide further details, context, or comments related to the subject.


Terminology

Code or Regulatory Requirements (equipment)

Formally defined criteria or standards that equipment must meet during procurement or development.

Exceeding Regulatory Requirements (equipment)

Performance criteria that go beyond minimum legal or code requirements applicable to the equipment.

Sustainability Equipment Specifications

Requirements or preferences for equipment that address sustainability performance and exceed applicable regulatory or code requirements.

Sustainability Objectives

Strategic priorities and key topics for the management and/or improvement of sustainability, resilience, and efficiency issues.

Sustainability Strategy

Strategy which (1) sets out the participant’s procedures and (2) sets the direction and guidance for the entity’s implementation of sustainability measures.

Validation: What evidence is required?

No evidence required.

Scoring

Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?

The scoring of this indicator is equal to the sum of the fractions assigned to the selected options and respective sub-options, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.


3

PC2: Materials Specifications

Validation

Evidence and other answer are manually validated

Control dependent?

No

Does the entity have specified requirements for the sustainability attributes of materials?

[SCORING KEY] A "scoring weight" is the fraction of the indicator's maximum score that a selection contributes (a multiplier, not a fixed point value). "[validated]" means the selection is subject to validation outputs. INPUT TYPES: groups are labelled (radio — select exactly one; options are mutually exclusive) or (checkbox — select all that apply); radio options are alternatives (not additive), checkbox options add together. CAPPING: total scoring is capped at the indicator's maximum (1/1); selecting options whose combined weight exceeds 1/1 does not award more than the maximum, and a group's contribution is capped at its own weight.

PC2 | Materials Specifications
Gate: Yes / No.
If Yes, select which materials the requirement(s) apply to (checkbox — select all that apply); all selections [validated]:
- Ready-mix concrete (structural, architectural, site work): 2/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Structural steel: 2/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Heavy timber: 2/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Metal wall panels: 2/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Glazing: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Gypsum board: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Non-structural metal: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Structurally insulated panels: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Thermal insulation: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Electrical and plumbing: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Other: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- No: 0 scoring weight

Assessment Instructions

Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?

This indicator examines whether the entity has specified sustainability requirements for materials used in construction, including the scope of materials covered. Establishing such requirements supports improved transparency on material impacts and helps identify opportunities to reduce embodied carbon and other environmental impacts.

Input: How do I complete this indicator?

Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.

  • If the entity uses Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs), it should indicate which building components are typically included within the LCA scope, as well as which lifecycle phases are covered.

    • This should include LCAs conducted for new construction projects, as well as for retrofits and renovations.

  • Other: State the other materials to which the requirements apply. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of the selected option above.


Terminology

Envelope

The envelope is the outer elements of a building, including walls, windows, roofs, and floors, including those in contact with earth.

Lifecycle assessment (LCA)

A comprehensive methodology for evaluating the environmental impacts of a product, process, or service throughout its entire life cycle, from raw material extraction through manufacturing, use, and end-of-life disposal or recycling. It quantifies resource consumption, emissions, and other environmental effects across all stages, providing a holistic view that helps identify opportunities for improvement and supports informed decision-making in product design and sustainability strategies.

Modules A1-A3

A1-A3 (also referred to as ‘cradle to gate’) cover the carbon emissions released during extraction, processing, manufacture (including prefabrication of components or elements) and transportation of materials between these processes, until the product leaves the factory gates to be taken to site. Note that biogenic carbon sequestered in the products used should not be included in the assessment of the upfront carbon. 

Module A4

A4 covers the carbon emissions released from the transport of materials or products from the factory gate to the construction site. 

Module A5

A5 covers carbon emissions due to activities on site (site huts, machinery use etc.) and the production, transportation and end of life processing of materials wasted on site. 

Sustainability Attributes (materials)

Validation: What evidence is required?

Evidence

The evidence provided will be subject to manual validation.

The evidence should support each of the selected issues. The evidence must demonstrate that the entity has defined sustainability-related requirements for materials, such as embodied carbon, recycled content, responsible sourcing, environmental certifications, or similar material attributes.

Other Answer

The other answer(s) provided will be subject to manual validation.

State the specific material or building element for which the entity has specified sustainability-related requirements. Other answers cannot be a duplicate of a previously selected option. Multiple Other answers are acceptable, but only one will count toward the score.

Scoring

Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?

The scoring of this indicator is equal to the fraction assigned to the selected option, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.

Evidence: For selections subject to manual validation, the validation status acts as a multiplier to determine that selection's final score.

If any requirements are not met, the evidence may not be accepted, depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.

Validation status
Multiplier

Accepted

1

Not Accepted

0

Other: The 'Other' answer is manually validated and assigned a score, which is used as a multiplying factor, as per the table below:

Validation status
Score

Accepted

1

Not Accepted

0

Duplicate

0

Scoring Basics


4

PC3: Embodied Carbon

Validation

Evidence not required

Control dependent?

No

Can the entity describe embodied carbon for new development projects relative to a baseline and as-designed carbon intensity?

[SCORING KEY] A "scoring weight" is the fraction of the indicator's maximum score that a selection contributes (a multiplier, not a fixed point value). "[validated]" means the selection is subject to validation outputs. INPUT TYPES: groups are labelled (radio — select exactly one; options are mutually exclusive) or (checkbox — select all that apply); radio options are alternatives (not additive), checkbox options add together. CAPPING: total scoring is capped at the indicator's maximum (1/1); selecting options whose combined weight exceeds 1/1 does not award more than the maximum, and a group's contribution is capped at its own weight.  PC3 | Embodied Carbon Gate: Yes / No. Unit selector (radio — select exactly one; options are mutually exclusive): tCO2/MW or tCO2/m2. Applies to both sub-questions below. 0 scoring weight. The following two options are independent checkboxes — each can be selected on its own or together to achieve full points:  Average baseline carbon intensity for new development data centers: 1/2 scoring weight As-designed embodied carbon for new development data centers: 1/2 scoring weight Selecting both awards 1/1 (full points). Selecting one awards 1/2. No: 0 scoring weight

Assessment Instructions

Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?

This indicator assesses whether the entity can measure and report embodied carbon for new development projects, including baseline and as-designed carbon intensity. Quantifying embodied carbon supports transparency and helps identify opportunities to reduce emissions associated with construction.

Input: How do I complete this indicator?

Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.

  • Selecting 'Yes' to the indicator will require reporting a value for at least the required metrics (average baseline carbon intensity and as-designed embodied carbon for new development data centers).

    • The entity should select the requirements that it uses in its procurement and purchasing processes. This should include materials used for new construction as well as renovations and retrofits.


Terminology

As-designed Embodied Carbon

The estimated embodied carbon of a project based on its final design specifications prior to construction.

Baseline Embodied Carbon

A reference scenario representing typical or business-as-usual embodied carbon performance against which improvements can be measured.

Carbon intensity

The amount of greenhouse gas emissions expressed per unit of output.

Embodied Carbon

Refers to the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with the extraction, manufacturing, transportation, construction, and end-of-life disposal of building materials and products, excluding operational emissions. It represents the carbon footprint "embedded" in materials before a project even begins operation.

Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)

A standardized, third-party verified document that transparently communicates the environmental impacts of a product throughout its life cycle, including information on carbon footprint, energy use, waste generation, and resource consumption. EPDs follow international standards (ISO 14025) and provide comparable, credible data that helps architects, designers, and purchasers make informed decisions about the environmental performance of building materials and other products.

Health Product Declaration

Products and materials for which the inventory of all ingredients used is publicly available, with a full disclosure of all known hazards and associated effects.

Rapidly Renewable Materials

Materials made from agricultural products that are typically harvested within a 10-year or shorter cycle, such as bamboo, wool, cotton insulation, Agrifiber, linoleum, wheatboard, strawboard and cork.

Validation: What evidence is required?

No evidence required.

Scoring

Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?

The scoring of this indicator is equal to the sum of the fractions assigned to the selected options and respective sub-options, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.

References

GRESB, 2026. What is embodied carbon in the real estate sector and why does it matter? Link


5

PC4: Sustainability Best Practices in Construction

Validation

Evidence and other answer are manually validated

Control dependent?

No

Does the entity include sustainability best practices in its construction requirements?

[SCORING KEY] A "scoring weight" is the fraction of the indicator's maximum score that a selection contributes (a multiplier, not a fixed point value). "[validated]" means the selection is subject to validation outputs. INPUT TYPES: groups are labelled (radio — select exactly one; options are mutually exclusive) or (checkbox — select all that apply); radio options are alternatives (not additive), checkbox options add together. CAPPING: total scoring is capped at the indicator's maximum (1/1); selecting options whose combined weight exceeds 1/1 does not award more than the maximum, and a group's contribution is capped at its own weight.

PC4 | Sustainability Best Practices in Construction
Gate: Yes / No.
If Yes, select the typical construction requirements set by the entity (checkbox — select all that apply); all selections [validated]:
- Construction and demolition waste diversion: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Construction-related air pollution mitigation: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Light pollution mitigation: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Minimization of site disturbance: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Noise pollution mitigation: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Protection and restoration of on-site habitat: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Rainwater and stormwater management: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- Other: 1/6 scoring weight [validated]
- No: 0 scoring weight

Assessment Instructions

Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?

This indicator assesses whether the entity includes sustainability best practices in construction requirements, including the scope of practices applied. Implementing such practices helps reduce environmental impacts during construction and supports more sustainable project delivery.

Input: How do I complete this indicator?

Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.

Other: State the other typical construction requirements set by the entity. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of the selected option above.


Terminology

Air Pollution

Air pollutants are particles and gases released into the atmosphere that may adversely affect living organisms. Additionally, some pollutants contribute to climate change or exacerbate the effects of climate change locally. Pollutants of major public health concern include ozone-depleting substances (ODS), NOx, SOx, particulate matter (PM), lead, mercury and/or other standard categories of air emissions identified in relevant regulations.

Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion

Measures implemented during construction to manage waste generated from construction and demolition activities to divert it from landfill through reuse, recycling, or recovery.

Construction-related Air Pollution Mitigation

Measures implemented during construction to monitor, manage, and reduce air pollutants generated during construction activities.

Construction Requirements

Formally defined criteria or standards that must be followed during construction activities.

Habitat

The natural home or environment of an animal, plant, or other organism.

Habitat enhanced or restored

Disturbed habitat that is identified and improved for the benefit of native animal and plant species that occur there.

Light Pollution Mitigation

Measures implemented during construction to minimize light emissions and their impact on surrounding environments, including reducing light trespass, limiting skyglow, and protecting sensitive receptors such as watercourses and nocturnal habitats.

Noise Pollution Mitigation

Measures implemented during construction to minimize noise impacts on surrounding communities and environments on-site during and after construction.

On-site Habitat Protection

Measures to protect native habitat structure, function, or ecological conditions on-site during and after construction.

On-site Habitat Restoration

Measures to restore and enhance native habitat structure, function, or ecological conditions on-site during and after construction.

Rainwater or Stormwater Management

Measures implemented to manage water flows and quality during and after construction to reduce runoff, prevent pollution, and protect receiving water bodies.

Site Disturbance Minimization

Measures implemented during construction to limit disruption to existing site conditions, including soils, vegetation, and habitats.

Sustainability Best Practices (construction)

Established construction practices that reduce environmental impact and are commonly recognized in industry standards or green building frameworks.

Validation: What evidence is required?

Evidence

The evidence provided will be subject to manual validation.

The evidence should support each of the selected issues.

The evidence must demonstrate that the selected requirements are included in the entity’s construction requirements, standards, specifications, or equivalent construction-phase documentation. A general sustainability practice or aspiration that is not a well-defined requirement set by the entity is insufficient and not applicable.

Other Answer

The other answer(s) provided will be subject to manual validation.

State the specific sustainability best practice included in the entity’s construction requirements and ensure that it relates to a sustainability-related requirement that applies during the construction phase of development projects.

Scoring

Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?

The scoring of this indicator is equal to the fraction assigned to the selected option, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.

Evidence: For selections subject to manual validation, the validation status acts as a multiplier to determine that selection's final score.

If any requirements are not met, the evidence may not be accepted, depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.

Validation status
Multiplier

Accepted

1

Not Accepted

0

Other: The 'Other' answer is manually validated and assigned a score, which is used as a multiplying factor, as per the table below:

Validation status
Score

Accepted

1

Not Accepted

0

Duplicate

0

Scoring Basics

6

Get Support: Solution Providers

GRESB Solution Providers are independent, third-party organizations within the GRESB Partner network that offer specialized products, tools, and services to support sustainability performance outside the GRESB Assessment process.

The organizations below deliver commercially available solutions designed to help drive improvement for this indicator. Engagement is managed directly between the reporting entity and the Solution Provider.

GRESB will continue to update this section as the GRESB Solution Provider network grows. Please check back regularly to find GRESB Solution Providers who can support your sustainability performance.


Last updated

Was this helpful?