Health & Safety
10 Points
The Health & Safety aspect assesses whether the entity manages health and safety through strategy, management, implementation, and performance measurement. Effective health and safety management helps reduce the risk of incidents, protect workers, attract talent, and support operational continuity.
HS0: Health & Safety Context
Maximum Score
Not scored
Static
Validation
Evidence not required
Control dependent?
No
Is there context that an investor or similar stakeholder needs to understand the entity’s response to the Health & Safety indicators?

Assessment Instructions
Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?
This indicator provides the entity with the opportunity to disclose additional context to support the interpretation of its responses to the Health & Safety indicators, helping stakeholders better understand the entity’s approach and circumstances.
Input: How do I complete this indicator?
Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If ‘Yes’, provide context to support the interpretation of the entity’s responses to this aspect’s indicators.
Open text box: The content of this open text box is not used for scoring, but will be included in the Insights and Benchmark Reports. Participants should use this open text box to provide further details, context, or comments related to the subject.
Terminology
Health and safety
Protecting the entity's stakeholders from harm or death due to injury or disease. Often, this is executed by developing policy, analyzing and controlling health and safety risks, providing training, and recording and investigating health and safety incidents.
Scoring
This indicator is not scored.
HS1: Health & Safety Strategy
Maximum Score
2.5 Points
Static
Validation
Evidence not required
Control dependent?
Yes
Has the entity set a strategy and/or defined a direction of travel for health and safety?

Assessment Instructions
Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?
This indicator assesses whether the entity has set a health and safety strategy and/or direction of travel, including whether it is reflected through short- and medium- to long-term targets and/or objectives. A clear strategy supports proactive management of health and safety risks and helps reduce the likelihood of incidents and associated liabilities.
Input: How do I complete this indicator?
Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.
If applicable, select the framework with which the strategy is aligned.
Examples include, but are not limited to, ISO 45001 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems.
Government frameworks reported should only include non-binding frameworks established by government bodies. Legislative frameworks fall outside the scope of this category.
Other: State the other framework with which the strategy is aligned. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of a selected option above.
Open text box: The content of this open text box is not used for scoring, but will be included in the Insights and Benchmark Reports. Participants should use this open text box to provide further details, context, or comments related to the subject.
Terminology
Direction of travel
The overall trajectory of an entity's approach over time, which outlines its strategic priorities and the milestones it expects to achieve.
Health & Safety strategy
The entity’s overall approach and direction of travel for managing health and safety, including the use of leading indicators, preventive controls, standardized procedures, and right-sized management practices to improve safety performance and support a resilient safety culture.
ISO 45001:2018 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems
Establishes the criteria for an occupational health and safety management system. Occupational health and safety management systems guide organizations to provide a safe and healthy workplace by preventing work-related injury and ill health and proactively improving their occupational health and safety performance.
Sustainability objectives
Strategic priorities and key topics for the management and/or improvement of sustainability, resilience, and efficiency issues.
Sustainability strategy
Strategy which (1) sets out the participant’s procedures and (2) sets the direction and guidance for the entity’s implementation of sustainability measures.
Scoring
Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?
The scoring of this indicator is equal to the sum of the fractions assigned to the selected options and respective sub-options, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.
HS2: Health & Safety Management
Maximum Score
2.5 Points
Static
Validation
Evidence and other answer are manually validated
Control dependent?
Yes
Can the entity indicate the practices it uses to manage its health and safety strategy?

Assessment Instructions
Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?
This indicator examines whether the entity has implemented structured health and safety management practices to deliver its strategy. Effective governance, clear accountability, documented policies, performance monitoring, and corrective action processes demonstrate the entity’s ability to proactively manage health and safety risks and respond effectively to emerging issues.
Input: How do I complete this indicator?
Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.
Other: State the other practice used to manage health and safety. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of a selected option above.
Terminology
Communication protocol
Formally established processes for sharing relevant information.
Corrective action
Corrective action in the context of safety refers to the systematic steps taken to eliminate the root causes of safety incidents, hazards, or non-compliance issues to prevent their recurrence. It typically involves investigating the underlying causes, implementing specific measures to address deficiencies, and monitoring the effectiveness of these measures to ensure lasting improvement in workplace safety performance.
Day-to-day implementation responsibility
The assigned responsibility for carrying out, managing, and monitoring the regular activities needed to put a policy, program, or process into practice.
Dedicated employee(s) on sustainability issues
Employee(s) whose primary responsibility is defining, implementing and monitoring the sustainability objectives at entity level.
External
Individuals or groups outside the reporting entity who influence or are influenced by its activities or decisions (e.g., investors, customers/tenants, communities).
Internal
Individuals or groups within the reporting entity who directly contribute to, oversee, or are affected by its operations and decisions (e.g., employees, leadership, contractors working under the organization's direction).
Policy
A policy is an organizational commitment, direction or intention that is formally adopted by the organization. It may serve the purpose of:
Outlining rules and procedures
Providing principles that guide action
Setting roles and responsibilities
Describing values and beliefs
Stating an intention to act or achieve defined goals and/or company vision
Mechanisms for evaluation and corrective action
Processes used to review greenhouse gas emissions performance and implement changes or improvements where needed.
Risk assessment
Careful examination of the factors that could potentially adversely impact the value or longevity of a data center. The results of the assessment assist in identifying measures that have to be implemented in order to prevent and mitigate the risks.
Risk evaluation
Comparing risk analysis results with risk criteria to determine whether the residual risk is tolerable.
Senior decision-maker responsible for sustainability-related issues
A senior individual with sign off (approval) authority for approving strategic sustainability objectives and steps undertaken to achieve these objectives. The responsible person oversees day-to-day execution, coordinates relevant stakeholders, and ensures progress towards define sustainability goals, but does not hold final-sign off authority for approving strategic decisions.
System(s) for performance measurement, data management, and reporting
The processes, tools, and systems used to collect, manage, analyze, and report energy-related data. These systems enable the monitoring of energy performance, tracking of targets, identification of trends, and disclosure of energy information to support decision-making and accountability.
Validation: What evidence is required?
Evidence
The evidence provided will be subject to manual validation.
The evidence should support each of the selected issues. The provided evidence must ensure the following:
Senior decision-maker vs. day-to-day responsibility: If the same person is selected for both “a senior decision-maker or executive with end responsibility” and “one or more persons with responsibility for day-to-day implementation,” the evidence must explicitly state that this person both signs off on the health and safety approach and oversees its implementation on a day-to-day basis.
Policy: The evidence must demonstrate the existence of a formal policy document that addresses health and safety, and not simply a list of general goals and/or commitments. A policy is a guide for action and may serve the purpose of:
outlining rules and procedures;
providing principles that guide action;
setting roles and responsibilities;
describing values and beliefs;
stating an intention to act or achieve defined goals and/or company vision.
Acceptable evidence may include, but is not limited to, a health and safety policy, official internal documents, or links to online resources describing the entity’s health and safety policy. References such as bullet points or extracts from the policy may be provided to show the relevant sections. Where overarching policy documents cover multiple issues, the evidence must clearly identify the section(s) relevant to health and safety.
Systems for performance measurement, data management, and reporting: The evidence must demonstrate a systematic process used to measure, manage, and report health and safety performance data. This may include tools, systems, dashboards, registers, or other formal processes used for tracking and reporting health and safety information.
Internal and external communication protocols: The evidence must demonstrate the process used to communicate material health and safety information internally and, where relevant, externally. If a policy is in place, what matters here is not only the existence of the policy, but also the communication channels or protocols used to share relevant health and safety information with the appropriate stakeholders.
Mechanisms for evaluation and corrective action: The evidence must demonstrate the method used to review health and safety performance and address identified issues. This may include incident investigation processes, corrective action plans, audits, root-cause analysis, escalation procedures, or other methods used to respond to incidents, accidents, breaches, or non-compliance.
Other Answer
The other answer(s) provided will be subject to manual validation.
Other answers cannot be a duplicate of a previously selected option. Multiple Other answers are acceptable, but only one will count toward the score.
Scoring
Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?
The scoring of this indicator is equal to the fraction assigned to the selected option, multiplied by the total score of the indicator.
Evidence: For selections subject to manual validation, the validation status acts as a multiplier to determine that selection's final score.
If any requirements are not met, the evidence may not be accepted, depending on the level of alignment with the requirements.
Accepted
1
Not Accepted
0
Other: The 'Other' answer is manually validated and assigned a score, which is used as a multiplying factor, as per the table below:
Accepted
1
Not Accepted
0
Duplicate
0
HS3: Health & Safety Implementation
Maximum Score
2.5 Points
Static
Validation
Other answer is manually validated
Control dependent?
Yes
Does the entity implement any actions as part of its health and safety strategy?

Assessment Instructions
Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?
This indicator identifies whether the entity can report on the implementation of health and safety actions during the reporting year. Demonstrating implementation provides evidence that the strategy is being translated into practice and helps stakeholders understand the extent of delivery across the portfolio.
Input: How do I complete this indicator?
Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.
Other: State the other action from the entity's health and safety strategy. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of a selected option above.
Control-Weighted
Control: The extent to which the reporting entity has the authority and ability to (i) implement actions and/or (ii) influence and collect performance measurement outcomes for a given sustainability topic.
The reported value should be consistent with the portfolio-level control percentage calculated using the GRESB Data Center Portfolio Evidence Template and reported through RC4.
Control-Weighted Score: GRESB provides a Control-Weighted Score as a supplementary score in the Insights Report. This score adjusts results based on the entity’s level of control over the indicators, illustrating how the GRESB Base Score changes when control is taken into account.
Terminology
Corrective action
Corrective action in the context of safety refers to the systematic steps taken to eliminate the root causes of safety incidents, hazards, or non-compliance issues to prevent their recurrence. It typically involves investigating the underlying causes, implementing specific measures to address deficiencies, and monitoring the effectiveness of these measures to ensure lasting improvement in workplace safety performance.
Contractor Orientation
Process of introducing contractors to a site’s rules, risks, procedures, and expectations so they can work safely, responsibly, and in compliance with required standards (ensuring contractors understand site-specific hazards and protocols prior to beginning).
Electrical safety training
Specialized instruction that teaches workers how to safely work with, operate, and maintain electrical systems and equipment to prevent electrical hazards such as shock, electrocution, arc flash, and fires.
Emergency Preparedness
Assesses readiness through frequency and participation in emergency response drills.
Ergonomic Risk
Number of assessments for tasks involving manual handling or repetitive motion.
Perception Surveys
Feedback on leadership commitment, communication, and psychological safety.
Safety audits
Safety audits are systematic, independent examinations of workplace safety practices, procedures, and conditions to evaluate compliance with safety regulations, identify potential hazards, and assess the effectiveness of existing safety management systems. They typically involve reviewing documentation, observing work practices, interviewing employees, and providing recommendations for improvement to prevent accidents and ensure regulatory compliance.
Safety Awareness Training
Training designed to increase workers’ awareness of workplace hazards, safe work practices, and individual responsibilities for maintaining a safe working environment.
Scoring
Scoring: How does GRESB score this indicator?
The scoring of this indicator is equal to the fraction assigned to the selected option, multiplied by the total score of the indicator. It is not necessary to select all options to achieve the maximum score.
Other: The 'Other' answer is validated and assigned a score which is used as a multiplying factor, as per the table below:
Accepted
1
Not Accepted
0
Duplicate
0
HS4: Health & Safety Measurement
Maximum Score
2.5 Points
Static
Validation
Evidence not validated
Control dependent?
Yes
Does the entity use metrics to track and measure the impact of its health and safety strategy?

Assessment Instructions
Intent: What is the purpose of this indicator?
This indicator assesses whether the entity can report quantitative health and safety performance during the reporting year, and whether reported data is subject to external review. Performance measurement strengthens accountability and transparency by enabling tracking over time and supporting confidence in reported outcomes.
Input: How do I complete this indicator?
Select ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. If 'Yes', select all applicable sub-options.
Selecting 'Yes' to the indicator will require reporting a value for at least the required metrics (Near-miss incidents, Total recordable injury frequency rate, and Worker groups covered in the reported data). The remaining metrics are optional.
Other: State the other quantitative metric used to monitor health and safety. Ensure that the other answer provided is not a duplicate of the selected option above.
Near-miss incidents = Total number of near-miss incidents, employees and/or contractors
Fatalities = Total number of fatalities, employees and/or contractors
Lost time injuries = Total number of lost time injuries in the course of work of employees and/or contractors. Includes fatalities, permanent disabilities and injuries that have led to absence from work.
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR) = Total number of Lost time injuries / Total hours worked X 1,000,000
Total recordable injuries = Total number of injuries that requires medical treatment beyond first aid, as well as one that causes death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, or loss of consciousness.
Total recordable injury rate (TRIFR) = Total number of recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers / Total number of hours worked X 1,000,000 Other = Select another type of health and safety metric and its quantitative data
External Review
Select 'Yes' or 'No': If “Yes,” specify the highest level of scrutiny applied to the submitted data (checked or verified/assured). If “verified/assured” is selected, indicate whether the review covered all or a subset of the data and provide supporting evidence.
The Scheme Lists page contains the complete lists of 1) accepted sustainability reporting standards and frameworks, and 2) assurance and verification schemes.
Additional assurance schemes may also receive recognition if they meet GRESB’s criteria. To submit a new scheme for review, please contact the GRESB team.
The final deadline for submitting a new assurance/verification scheme for review by the GRESB team is March 15th. Schemes submitted for review after March 15th will not be reviewed until the subsequent reporting year.
Control-Weighted
Control: The extent to which the reporting entity has the authority and ability to (i) implement actions and/or (ii) influence and collect performance measurement outcomes for a given sustainability topic.
The reported value should be consistent with the portfolio-level control percentage calculated using the GRESB Data Center Portfolio Evidence Template and reported through RC4.
Control-Weighted Score: GRESB provides a Control-Weighted Score as a supplementary score in the Insights Report. This score adjusts results based on the entity’s level of control over the indicators, illustrating how the GRESB Base Score changes when control is taken into account.
Terminology
Contractors
Persons or organizations working onsite or offsite on behalf of an entity. A contractor can contract their own workers directly, or contract sub-contractors or independent contractors. Suppliers are not considered contractors for the purposes of this indicator.
Externally checked
Applies to instances when a third party has reviewed the data in a structured and consistent process, but no official certification has been awarded.
Externally assured
Applies to instances where a third party has reviewed the data against an existing scheme.
Externally verified
Applies to instances where a third party has reviewed the data against an existing scheme.
Employees
Someone who works directly for the entity and receives compensation in the form of an hourly wage or annual salary for their work. This can be both on-site or off-site (such as in an administration office). Employers typically have to pay specific benefits, such as contributions to pensions or taxes for employees. Employees may be either full-time or part-time and may operate on a short-term contract.
Fatality
The death occurring in the current reporting period, arising from an injury or disease sustained or contracted.
Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Full Time Equivalent, a unit to measure the number of employed persons to make them comparable regardless of the number of working hours. FTE can be calculated by comparing the number of hours worked by an employee against the average number of hours of a full time worker. For example, if the number of hours worked by an employee in a week is 20, and the standard full time work week consists of 40 hours, the employee is counted as 0.5 FTE.
Lost time injuries
Lost Time Injuries (LTI) are workplace injuries or illnesses that result in an employee being unable to return to work for their next scheduled shift or work day. These incidents are significant enough to prevent the worker from performing their regular duties, distinguishing them from minor injuries that may require medical treatment but don't cause work absence.
Lost time injury frequency rate
LTIFR (Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate) is a safety performance metric that measures the number of lost time injuries per million hours worked by employees. It's commonly used in industries to track and benchmark workplace safety performance, with a lost time injury being one that results in an employee being unable to return to work for a period of time.
Near-miss incidents
Unplanned events or situations in the workplace that had the potential to cause injury, illness, or damage but did not actually result in harm due to chance, timely intervention, or other factors. They serve as valuable safety indicators and learning opportunities, as analyzing near misses can help identify hazards and prevent actual accidents from occurring.
Total recordable injuries
TRI (Total Recordable Injuries) refers to the total count of all workplace injuries and illnesses that meet the local jurisdiction’s criteria for recording. It's the numerator used to calculate TRIFR and serves as a comprehensive measure of all significant workplace incidents that require documentation under occupational safety regulations.
Total recordable injury frequency rate
TRIFR (Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate) is a safety performance metric that measures the total number of recordable workplace injuries per million hours worked. It includes all work-related injuries requiring medical treatment, restricted work, or time away from work, providing a broader measure of workplace safety performance than LTIFR since it captures injuries that don't necessarily result in lost time.
Scoring
Last updated
Was this helpful?

