Defining the Reporting Portfolio
Indicators RC3 (Location) and RC4 (Business Model and Entity Composition) define the scope of the reporting portfolio in the Data Center Assessment.
Together, they determine where the portfolio is located and how it is structured, including the business models and sites that are included in the assessment. Completing these indicators correctly is critical, as they directly affect the how GRESB scores and benchmarks the assessment response.
This page will help you:
Understand the key concepts used in these indicators (e.g., site, region)
Apply a consistent approach to defining and, where relevant, splitting the organization's portfolio into reporting entities
Key Concepts
What are the UN M49 Regions?
A standard classification of countries and areas developed by the United Nations for statistical purposes, which groups the world into regions and sub-regions based on geographic and statistical considerations. As defined by the United Nations, this classification is “used to arrange countries or areas into regions and subregions for statistical convenience.”
What is a site?
A discrete physical location containing one or more data centers or a group of structures/buildings that support data processing, storage, networking, power, cooling, security, and connectivity.
The intent is that a site is homogeneous with respect to controlling local authority, physical electricity supply, resource management issues, and land use context (e.g., rural, suburban, urban).
A site should occur entirely within a single political boundary (e.g., city, county, or equivalent administrative division), utility service territory, and major water resource management area.
Ultimately, these decisions seek to help investors and other data users understand the distribution of business models and control that influence opportunities and constraints on sustainability management and performance measurement.
In this context, a participant needs to consider several factors:
Sites are intended to be discrete physical locations that are homogeneous with respect to key factors influencing sustainability management and performance.
This may allow for the aggregation of multiple facilities or even campuses if they share similar business models and patterns of operational control.
Alternatively, this may require splitting campuses or even facilities if they differ materially in business models and patterns of control.
This information is essential for investors and other stakeholders to understand what a developer or operator can and cannot control across their portfolio. This facilitates a constructive, actionable dialog between stakeholders.
In the GRESB Data Center Assessment, a site is reported at one of three levels: Facility, Campus, or Multi-Campus.
What are business models?
The operational and commercial structure through which a data center entity develops, owns, leases, manages, or delivers data center infrastructure and services to customers. In the context of the GRESB Data Center Assessment, business models can be one of the following:
Owner-Operator (Single-tenant)
Owner-Operator (Multi-tenant)
Developer-Hold Landlord (Powered Shell)
Developer-Hold Landlord (Turnkey Lease)
Developer-to-Sell / Merchant Developer
Managed Operator
How to Define Your Reporting Portfolio
Defining the reporting portfolio is a critical step in the GRESB Data Center Assessment, as it determines how GRESB scores the assessment and benchmarks its results.
Each assessment represents a single reporting entity, defined by:
A single location
One or more business models
Use the steps below to define the reporting portfolio for the assessment.
Step 2 – Define the Portfolio Composition
Report the composition of the portfolio within the selected location.
Indicate the portion of the overall organization represented by this reporting entity.
If the reporting entity is part of a larger company or organization, indicate the portion of Capacity (MW) that the reporting portfolio represents
Select the applicable business model(s)
Report the corresponding capacity (MW) and number of sites for each
All information must align with the location selected in RC3 and include only sites within that region.
Step 3 – Decide Whether to Split the Portfolio
Depending on the structure of the portfolio, the reporting entity may be reported as a single assessment or split into multiple reporting entities.
Required: Split by region (one assessment per RC3 location)
Recommended: Split by business model when multiple models are present
Example Reporting Structures
Last updated
Was this helpful?





