What's New

Published March 31, 2026

Resources & Support

About GRESB Guides

Infrastructure Standard Development

The 2026 Infrastructure Standards updates reduce reporting burden through a more static Fund Assessment, sharpen focus on material issues such as sustainability-related risk and net zero, and ensure that GRESB results remain actionable and relevant.

Fund Assessment

The Fund Assessment becomes more static, reducing annual reporting where no material changes occur. Funds are encouraged to use the pre-fill functionality which is pre-selected upon starting the submission.

A few indicators remain not entirely pre-fillable due to their variable nature and are flagged to the user directly in the Assessment Portal. Some key highlights include:

  • RC2: Review of GAV and NAV values, which change annually.

  • RP1: This indicator has been simplified to require a single disclosure type, reducing reporting effort.

  • RC6 (Portfolio of Assets): Funds are encouraged to review and update any linked assets.

Find the full Infrastructure Fund Standard updates here

Asset Assessment

Updates include streamlining the reporting process and decreasing reporting burden for Participants, raising the bar on sustainability reporting and risk assessment requirements, and reflecting materiality outcomes for net zero more accurately.

Key highlights:

  • RP1: Simplified to require a single disclosure type, reducing reporting burden

  • GH2: Improved treatment of net-zero materiality for renewables assets and separate reporting on GHG emissions and net zero

  • RM2.1, RM2.2, RM2.3: Participants are now required to have identified, analyzed, evaluated, and treated the risks they select as part of the risk assessment indicators

  • NZIF Alignment Module integrated into the Asset Assessment

  • Minor updates to climate scenarios and management systems

Find the full Infrastructure Asset Standard updates here

Development Asset Assessment

Updates include measures to further streamline the reporting process and raise the bar for sustainability reporting.

Key highlights:

  • RP1: Simplified to require a single disclosure type, reducing reporting burden

  • Minor updates to climate scenarios and management systems

Find the full Infrastructure Development Asset Standard updates here


NZIF Alignment for Infrastructure

The GRESB NZIF Alignment Tool is now available as part of the GRESB Infrastructure Asset Assessment.

Following a successful pilot in 2025, the new tool, developed with IIGCC, provides a standardized approach to understanding how infrastructure assets, funds, and portfolios align with the Net Zero Investment Framework (NZIF). It uses existing GRESB data reported through the Asset Assessment alongside a short, voluntary GRESB NZIF Module.

The tool can help infrastructure investors, managers, and assets:

  • gain a consistent, comparable view of NZIF alignment across participating assets and portfolios

  • support clearer and more focused engagement on net-zero progress

  • reduce the need for multiple or bespoke NZIF-related data requests to managers and assets

Participation in the GRESB NZIF Module is optional and free for assets taking part in the GRESB Infrastructure Asset Assessment. As a result, assets that complete the module will receive a GRESB NZIF Alignment Report. Investors and managers with access to the asset’s GRESB Benchmark Report also receive access to the NZIF Alignment Report. Participation in the module does not affect GRESB Scores or benchmarks.

You can learn more about the GRESB NZIF Alignment Tool on the GRESB website.

For further details, the GRESB NZIF Module guidance is available here.


Improved GRESB Experience

GRESB has introduced several enhancements to reduce workload, improve usability, and strengthen data quality:

Assessment portal improvements:

  • Enhanced pre-fill function for Fund Assessment

  • Indicators with a scoring change due to Standard Updates will now be flagged with a 2026 Scoring Update label and linked to corresponding guidance


GRESB Assessment Q&A Webinar

On April 2nd, the GRESB Member Success team held a live webinar for participants to discuss and ask questions about the 2026 Infrastructure Assessments.

Watch the session on-demand here:


Resources & Support

GRESB Guides

Earlier this year, GRESB launched GRESB Guides, a redesigned resource platform that brings together all core assessment guidance and replaces legacy resource areas—making it easier to find the information you need.

  • Updated structure: In response to Member feedback, each assessment now has its own dedicated space consolidating key guidance into an all-in-one platform.

  • AI-supported search feature (Beta): GRESB Guides now includes an enhanced search feature that provides short, AI-supported answers directly from the search box. This feature is currently in Beta (testing phase) while GRESB continues to refine it and collect user feedback. Always verify responses against the official guidance and review this disclaimer before use.

Read more about GRESB Guides here

GRESB Helpdesk

The GRESB Helpdesk is powered by the GRESB Member Success Team, dedicated to providing GRESB Members (Investors, Participants, and Partners) with timely and responsive support on the GRESB Assessment.

Contact [email protected] for support from the Member Success Team.

GRESB Participants requiring additional assistance with their submission can also refer to our network of contracted GRESB Partners. See our Partner Directory.


Strengthen Your Submission with GRESB

Starting April 1, participants can request a Pre-Submission Check—an evidence validation review which includes a one-hour call and a report outlining findings and feedback.

New in 2026:

  • Technical Expert Touchpoint: Available year-round, this service provides focused, one-on-one face time engagement with a GRESB Member Success expert, offering tailored guidance at any stage of your GRESB journey.

  • Success Suite: A new bundled offering that brings together core premium support elements in the GRESB journey, including: one GRESB AP seat, one Technical Expert Touchpoint, one Pre-Submission Check, eligibility to opt in to Assessment Correction, and one Results Performance Review (formerly Results Consultation).

Post-assessment services: Get familiar with the Assessment Correction and Results Performance Review for a thorough review of your assessment results. In 2024, participants who used the Results Performance Review saw their GRESB score jump by approximately seven points on average compared to the year before.

For any questions about the Assessments, services, or products, please contact the GRESB Member Relations team.

Technical Clarifications

This section will note any clarifications or additions that GRESB makes to the assessment guidance from April 1st onwards.

  • Independent third-party definition (RP1): Positioned the definition as a set of exemplary characteristics underpinning 'independence,' rather than a set of hard restrictions, by removing the reference to "must."


About GRESB Guides

Welcome to GRESB Guides, GRESB's dedicated knowledge hub. GRESB launched this platform in 2026 to streamline access to key information and create a more intuitive user learning experience.

This page will guide you through everything you need to know about the improvements GRESB made to its educational material in 2026. It categorizes these improvements as:

  1. Structural changes: Understand how to find the content you're looking for.

  2. Guidance clarifications: Learn about member-driven clarifications to GRESB guidance.

Note that these improvements differ in scope from Standards-related updates, which the GRESB Foundation oversees. See here for 2026 Standards Updates.

Structural Changes

GRESB Guides replaces the legacy resource areas (e.g., documents.gresb.com) with a more practical user experience that reflects how participants complete GRESB Assessments. The content remains completely aligned with the GRESB Standards; what changed is the accessibility and clarity of guidance.

This section summarizes the location of legacy guidance materials in GRESB Guides. To identify the exact location of key information, GRESB strongly recommends using the search bar at the top of the screen.

Tip: Filter your search for "Only the current section" to generate more precise results.

Where can I find familiar resources in GRESB Guides?
Guidance
Legacy Location
GRESB Guides Location

Indicator reporting instructions

Reference Guide

Completing GRESB Assessments > Indicator Page

Indicator validation requirements

Reference Guide

Completing GRESB Assessments > Indicator Page

Indicator scoring

Scoring Document

Completing GRESB Assessments > Indicator Page

Reporting scope requirements

Reference Guide Introduction

Getting Started > Assessment Structure and Scope

Assessment structure

Reference Guide Introduction

Getting Started > Assessment Structure and Scope

Tecnical FAQs

Standalone PDF

Completing GRESB Assessments > Indicator Page

Estimation rules

Reference Guide Appendix

Completing GRESB Assessments > Supporting Information

Validation information

Reference Guide Appendix

Completing GRESB Assessments > Supporting Information

Indicator summary guide

Standalone PDF

Completing GRESB Assessments > Aspect and Indicator Pages

Standard updates and GRESB Foundation Roadmap

Standalone PDFs

Getting Started > GRESB Standards

How to Read your Benchmark Report

Standalone PDF

Leveraging your Data > Results Insights

Peer Group methodology

Standalone PDF / GRESB website

Leveraging your Data > Results Insights

Portfolio Analysis Tool (PAT)

GRESB website / Training platform

Leveraging your Data > Asset and Portfolio Analysis

Data Exporter

GRESB website

Leveraging your Data > Data Management

Guidance Clarifications

General Clarifications

Topic
Description

Language Clarity

Modified content for grammatical correctness and consistency, and updated terminology where needed to improve clarity across the site

Indicator Intents

Refreshed numerous indicator intent sections to ensure they remain aligned with the goals of the GRESB Standards

Asset Performance

Improved the readability of performance indicator (e.g., Energy, Air Pollution) instructions and scoring explanations

Scoring Explanations

Simplified and harmonized indicator-level scoring explanations

Specific Indicator Clarifications

Note that the table below does not include editorial improvements.

Fund
Topic
Location
Description

Verification/Assurance of Sustainability Data

RP1

Clarified that, while assurance/verification of sustainability disclosure should cover all sustainability information, GRESB will only seek to confirm that the third-party review covers a single sustainability topic.

Third-Party Independence

RP1

Defined third-party independence in the context of data review, which will be manually validated for a random sample of participants.

Employee Training

SE2

Refined the definitions of professional and sustainability-related training.

Third-Party Surveys

SE3

Refined the "Independent third-party" definition in the context of satisfaction survey administration.

Climate-Related Risk Management

RM3.1-3.6

Clarified that the open text boxes are considered during manual evidence validation. Defined "material financial impact."

Targets

T1

Amended the "science-based target" definition to correct an inaccuracy that did not properly reflect the Paris agreement language (which is to aim to keep warming well below 2°C, pursuing 1.5°C).

Asset

Management Component

Topic
Location
Description

Verification/Assurance of Sustainability Data

RP1

Clarified that, while assurance/verification of sustainability disclosure should cover all sustainability information, GRESB will only seek to confirm that the third-party review covers a single sustainability topic.

Third-Party Independence

RP1

Defined third-party independence in the context of data review, which will be manually validated for a random sample of participants.

Policy Evidence

PO1-3

Expanded upon evidence exemption criteria for scenarios in which policies remain unchanged.

Environmental Management System

RM1

Clarified that participant should select whether the entity is aligned or accredited to each standard.

Climate-Related Risk Management

RM.4.1-4.6

Clarified that the open text boxes are considered during manual evidence validation. Defined "material financial impact."

Performance Component

Topic
Location
Description

Data Review

GH1

Clarified that verification/assurance should cover Scope II location-based emissions, and that the "Externally checked" option is not scored.

Third-Party Independence

GH1

Defined third-party independence in the context of data review, which will be manually validated for a random sample of participants.

Targets

GH2

Amended the "science-based target" definition to correct an inaccuracy that did not properly reflect the Paris agreement language (which is to aim to keep warming well below 2°C, pursuing 1.5°C).

Health & Safety

HS1-2

Clarified the definition of recordable injuries.

Employee Training

EM1

Clarified that the percentage of employees should capture those who participated in training. Refined the definitions of professional and sustainability-related training.

Third-Party Surveys

EM1 / CU1

Refined the "Independent third-party" definition in the context of satisfaction survey administration.

Survey Coverage

EM1 / CU1

Amended the survey coverage calculation instructions to only consider individuals who could have received a survey (i.e., the number of potential recipients at the time of survey administration).

Development Asset
Topic
Location
Description

Verification/Assurance of Sustainability Data

RP1

Clarified that, while assurance/verification of sustainability disclosure should cover all sustainability information, GRESB will only seek to confirm that the third-party review covers a single sustainability topic.

Third-Party Independence

RP1

Defined third-party independence in the context of data review, which will be manually validated for a random sample of participants.

Climate-Related Risk Management

RM.5.1-5.6

Clarified that the open text boxes are considered during manual evidence validation. Defined "material financial impact."

Targets

GH1

Amended the "science-based target" definition to correct an inaccuracy that did not properly reflect the Paris agreement language (which is to aim to keep warming well below 2°C, pursuing 1.5°C).

Last updated

Was this helpful?