2026 Asset Assessment
This page summarizes the full list of questions within the GRESB Infrastructure Asset Assessment.
How are the infrastructure assessments organized?

Component
The highest-level category in the assessment. Each component represents a broad area of sustainability evaluation (e.g., management, performance, development).
The Infrastructure Fund Assessment is made of only one Management Component. The Infrastructure Asset and Development Asset Assessments, which funds’ underlying assets complete, include Performance and Development Components (respectively) that may contribute to a fund’s overall GRESB Score
Aspect
Each component is made up of several aspects, which group together related themes. For example, within the Management component, there are aspects such as Policies, Reporting, and Risk Management. Note that the SFDR Assessments do not contain aspects.
Indicator
The most detailed level of the hierarchy. Indicators are specific, measurable questions used to assess performance within an aspect (e.g., “Has the entity set GHG reduction targets aligned with Net Zero?”).
Component
Max Score
40 Points
60 Points
Unscored
Download the Excel version of the assessment below:
Entity & Reporting Characteristics [Unscored]
All indicators in the Entity & Reporting Characteristics Aspect are un-scored and none require evidence.
Module
Indicator
Topic
Pre-fill
Management Component
Module
Indicator
Topic
Max Score
Pre-fill
Evidence
Pillar
Sustainability, Climate-related and/or Human Capital senior Decision Maker
1.65 point
Eligible
Not required
Governance
Environmental Risk Assessments
2.85 points
Eligible
Required
Environment
Strategy Resilience to Climate-Related Risk & Opportunity
0.57 points
Eligible
Not required
Governance
Physical Risk Impact Assessment
0.57 points
Eligible
Required
Governance
Performance Component
Materiality outcomes determine the maximum score of all Performance Component indicators (with the exception of CA1, which is not scored).
Module
Indicator
Topic
Pre-fill
Evidence
Pillar
*GRESB ‘pre-validates’ certain evidence if the participant’s response and supporting documentation remains consistent year-over-year. When applicable, this means previous year’s validation decision is carried over to the current submission.
For the 2026 assessment, this applies to: LE4 and PO1-3, Note that PO1-3 have unique pre-validation criteria, described here.
NZIF Alignment Module [Optional & Unscored]
Last updated
Was this helpful?

